Derek A Smith

Derek A Smith
Combative Arts Expert

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Could You Survive This?



5 lessons learned from a deadly encounter with an "unarmed" subject
In Waterloo, Iowa, a suspect is "unarmed" — but still very dangerous — in a textbook case for never underestimating a "weaponless" opponent

Many of you martial artist and Joe Badasses think you are pretty tough and can handle yourself on the street. But let me tell you, after 30 years in security and Law Enforcement martial art school fighting is nothing…and I mean nothing like the real thing. Could you survive This?

When Officer Steven Bose finished the fight with a round to his attacker’s chest, his throat was filling with blood and he thought his right eye had been gouged from his head. He was prone on the ground and screaming in pain, while his partner groped in the dark, trying to find his eyeball. Bose seemed a textbook example of “grievous bodily harm.”
But relatives of the suspect alleged in the media that it was Bose who really was the villain in the drama. His use of gunfire was “excessive force,” they claimed — and they played a card that often stirs deep doubts in the civilian mind: Their kinsman wasn’t even armed when the cop shot him dead.

Before the matter was resolved, Bose was exposed to the possibility of criminal charges. For pulling the trigger during the most desperate struggle of his career, he could have gone to prison for murder.

Bose and his acting chief, Captain John Beckman of the Waterloo (Iowa) PD, recently wanted to help PoliceOne reconstruct the ordeal as a cautionary case. But City Atty. James Walsh, leery of a possible civil suit, muzzled them.
Fortunately, the county attorney who handled a grand jury hearing of the shooting and a nationally recognized use-of-force expert who consulted on the incident see it as a teaching opportunity that can help other LEOs. In exclusive interviews, they have supplied the first public details of the late-shift nightmare that began, as life threats so often do, as a perfectly ordinary call.

The run was dispatched as a disorderly, says Black Hawk County Atty. Thomas Ferguson. At 0218 that Saturday last September, an exasperated wife told a 911 operator that she and her husband had earlier had “a big argument,” and now he’d come back home drunk. She’d locked him out, and he was sitting on the porch steps outside their side door. She wanted the cops to “remove him.”( Derek'd commentary - a domestic dispute is one of the worse situations to be involved in)

There was no foreshadowing of violence, Ferguson says. “It wasn’t even dispatched as a domestic assault. She just wanted him to leave. It was a normal call like they’d been on hundreds of times before.”

Officers Bose and Jamie Sullivan arrived in separate units and headed up the driveway toward the porch, which was illuminated by a single bulb above the door. A ride-along accompanying Bose that night trailed behind and kept his distance.

At the porch, just beyond an SUV parked in the driveway of the modest, one-story house, they greeted the wife, her father whom she’d called for support before ringing 911, and, the biggest among them by far, the intoxicated husband — 6’4”, 260 lbs., a 31-year-old construction worker “accustomed to heaving around big chunks of concrete,” as a source familiar with the case put it later. (Derek - already a situation brewing.  With his size I would have called for backup)

The “big argument,” as it turned out, was over BS: the husband had taken offense at their two young daughters wearing Packers jerseys. “It didn’t look like there were any real problems,” Ferguson says. But as the officers tried to sort things out, “the wife started getting more agitated, and they wanted to be sure nothing further happened.”

Sullivan stayed with her and her father. Bose, 29, with nearly seven years on the department, took the husband over behind the SUV, a few yards away.

There, the call went south in a hurry.

Bose and the man engaged in some discussion about his finding another place to stay. The man rejected that notion, saying he just wanted to go in the house and go to bed. With a curse, he started toward the side door. Bose put his left hand on the subject’s chest to stop him, and the night exploded. (Derek - cops often become complacent.  He should have maintained a safe distance from a big, intoxicated dude like this)

BAM!!! The man smashed his fist into Bose’s face. (Derek - too close)  Momentarily dazed, the officer woozily grabbed him and tried to hip-toss him “but underestimated his size,” Ferguson says (Derek - judo and BJJ is not for the street!).

The two went down on the driveway, Bose landing on his hands and knees, with his attacker partially on the officer’s back, grappling his head and neck. Bose struggled desperately to free himself but couldn’t. He said afterward the assailant threatened to kill him as they fought. (Derek - Bad guy had his back.  ALready big trouble.  Could have killed the cop)

Hearing the commotion, Sullivan rushed over from the porch and began hammering the atttacker on the head with his fists.  The man “did not release his hold,” Ferguson says. Instead, he escalated the attack. (Derek-  See, fist to the hard head is not the answer)

“Somehow,” the prosecutor says, “he got a hand inside Bose’s left cheek” and started fish-hooking it. He pulled on it so hard that “he actually ripped the cheek away from where it attaches to the jawbone. Bose’s mouth started filling with blood.” (Derek - Why didn't the cop bite his fingers off)

With Sullivan continuing to strike him, the attacker moved his other hand to Bose’s face and pushed hard and relentlessly against his right eye, whipsawing the officer’s head as he simultaneously yanked on his cheek and gouged his eye. To Bose, it felt like his face was tearing apart and his eye popping out. He could scarcely breathe. (Derek- This is why I teach eye gouges.  This is how bad guys REALLY fight, and you have to do the same to defeat them.  Chek out my DVD'd at http://specialagentcombativesystem.com)

Reaching at what seemed like an impossible angle, he managed to wrest his TASER out of its holster and fired it up and back at his assailant. “The probes did not make sufficient contact to complete a circuit,” Ferguson says. The man “neither relented nor released.”  (Derek - At this point this is a deadly force situation already.  But the cop reaches for a TASER.  He was not ready for a REAL self defense encounter)

Sullivan fired his TASER, too. Again, no reaction. Sullivan then attempted a drive stun; the suspect still showed no evidence of relenting. Struggling against the pain and the suspect’s crushing weight, Bose was able eventually to reach and draw his Glock.

He fired twice into his assailant at point-blank range. “We believe the first round hit him in the thigh but did not stop him,” Ferguson says. “The second struck him in the chest. He finally released.” He was dead at the scene.
Bose thought his eye had been gouged from his head, Ferguson says. His anguished cries of pain led Sullivan to think so, too. The partner frantically searched the shadows nearby trying to find it.

Actually, Bose’s eye was lacerated but still in place. The agony was so intense it just felt like it had been ripped out.
The “shots fired” call was logged at Waterloo PD at 0227, less than nine minutes after the wife’s initial complaint.(Derek-It does not take long in a REAL fight)

The suspect’s family wasted no time rallying their forces against the police. On Sunday, dozens of friends and relatives gathered in downtown Waterloo to protest what they said was unjustified and excessive action by officers.

“They shot an unarmed man twice,” his widow was quoted as saying. Her father complained, “They never said they were about to take him to the ground. They never warned him they were gonna’ ‘tase him and they never warned him they were about to shoot.”

The dead man was described as “a gentle giant and loving father…not a violent man,” and protesters told reporters that “officers did not have a legitimate reason to shoot him and [we] can’t understand how he ended up killed.” Records indicate he’d been arrested several times for public intoxication and had been convicted 12 years earlier for assaulting a peace officer, but “marriage and fatherhood changed him,” protesters insisted.

The county attorney’s office consulted on the case with the behavioral scientist Dr. Bill Lewinski, one of the nation’s premier experts on use-of-force dynamics and executive director of the Force Science Institute. Lewinski draws a vivid picture of what Bose and Sullivan were up against in their battle to control the “gentle giant.”

He characterizes the assailant during the incident as “an irrational person who was so distraught and so intensely focused on his own course of action that he couldn’t be influenced by the officers. He was dangerous without a knife or a gun. His empty hands alone could kill. (Derek - that is the reality folks.  SO you have to have the same mentality)

“Blows to the head, Tasering, a shot to the leg — his assault continued at the same level through all of them. People that determined have an astounding capacity to override pain. Nothing the officers could have done physically or verbally short of deadly force could have convinced him to stop. They had no choice other than to utterly defeat him — or give up.”

The choke hold/head lock he had on Bose threatened to crush the officer’s larynx, cut off his oxygen, trip his heart into fibrillation, and/or render him unconscious, Lewinski says. Gored deeply enough, the finger jammed in his eye could have penetrated beyond the eyeball into brain matter, with potentially fatal consequences. “Few things have as great a sensory consequence for a human being as a finger in the eye,” he says. “It’s not just a matter of physical pain, it’s a horrendous psychological assault that leads to a high state of desperation in most people.”

He says he considers Bose lucky to have survived the fight.(Derek - Indeed he was.  I hope he is trainining now)

Ferguson says his office reviews officer-involved shootings on a case-by-case basis, with some going to a grand jury and some being ruled on internally as to whether deadly force was justified. In this case, largely because of controversy about the subject being “unarmed,” he felt that public confidence would best be assured if the matter was submitted to a grand jury.

Potentially this subjected Steve Bose to significant new risks. If the civilian jury decided his shooting was unwarranted, he could be indicted on counts as serious as murder. And the decision did not have to be unanimous. If five of the jury’s seven members believed he was culpable, he would stand criminally charged. “The stress on an officer in this situation is tremendous,” Ferguson says.

Fortunately, by the time Lewinski’s observations and other evidence in the case had been presented, the grand jurors understood the actions of that fateful night from Bose’s unique perspective. Just before Christmas, the panel returned a “no bill” and Bose was exonerated. He has also been cleared in a separate review by his department.
In January, Bose returned to street patrol, still working midnights and reportedly glad to be back on full duty. His injuries are said to have healed with no permanent major damage, except for thick scar tissue along the inside of his cheek at the base of his jaw, which he feels every time he chews.

Lessons learned? Ferguson and Lewinski combine to offer several:

1. Expect the unexpected. Realize how quickly and surprisingly “unremarkable” calls can turn into life-threatening events. No matter how commonplace a contact may appear, the potential for violence is always present, particularly when you’re dealing with a subject who’s in a chemically altered, emotionally charged state.

2. Don’t underestimate a “weaponless” threat. Hands, elbows, knees, feet, even the human head can inflict devastating damage, not just when you’re dealing with trained martial artists but also with amateurs who are driven by deadly intensity.

3. Recognize hot-button moments. “This situation went to hell when Officer Bose necessarily set limits on the suspect by putting his hand on the man’s chest to keep him from returning to the house and to his wife’s location,” says Lewinski. “When the suspect was touched, it was symbolic of the gates being shut on his options. That is always a moment—a tripping point—of great vulnerability that officers need to be cognizant of. Assaults frequently occur when an officer is either beginning to handcuff a subject or is laying hands on him. Any time you touch a suspect, be prepared for resistance.”

4. Document your calls. If you have portable audio or video equipment, use it. The officers that night were equipped with body mics, but they did not turn them on when they approached the scene. “Recordings could have been useful in confirming what happened,” Ferguson says. “Almost always, they will be helpful to you.”

5. Understand your force options. Typically, state laws sanction the use of deadly force when you reasonably believe you are in danger of serious bodily harm, not just when you fear your life is at risk. “You are not hired to be a blue punching bag,” Lewinski states. “You have a right to defend your life and your well-being, and to hesitate in emphatically ending a dangerous assault on yourself or a partner can be a fatal mistake. The longer a fight goes on, the greater your risk of losing your gun or losing your life.”

Meanwhile, County Attorney Ferguson has arranged for his community to become better educated about the realities of police use of force. Next September, just about on the anniversary of the shooting, he and the city of Waterloo have contracted with the Force Science Institute to present a two-day program for law enforcement personnel on the latest research findings related to human dynamics in force confrontations — followed by a special half-day in which Lewinski will brief more than 100 invited elected officials, reporters, human rights activists, and other influential civilians on the truths and myths of officer-involved shootings. For the rest of that day, the group will be exposed to simulator training at a local college law enforcement academy.

Ferguson says, “We hope to have them walk away with more reasonable expectations of police actions and a better understanding of why officers act as they do”

This is exactly why you need the type of training I offer in Special Agent Combative System and Brutal Beyond Belief. Check out my website for more real life survival training.

To Learn how to handle yourself in these types of situations, be sure to visit http://www.specialagentcombativesystem.com often.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

The Fighting Library

Excellent Ultimate Fighting, Self-Defense Product with Stellar commission. Check the site for more http://fightinglibrary.com/affiliates.html


Check it out!

Street Fighter Moves - 3 Categories of Martial Arts - Why You Must Know the Difference (Part 3 of 3)


Reality-Based Self Defense, also know as Reality-Based Fighting or RBF has a certain irony surrounding it. Most people do not have a clear distinction of it as one of 3 major categories of fighting, yet most people when they enroll in a martial arts class or strip mall dojo (as I fondly call a McDojo) believe that they will learn Reality-Based Street Fighting.

The same goes for those, who are duly impressed after watching a MMA fighting match with all of the intense "grounding and pounding" with emphasis on locks, throws and grappling, also go out and sign up with a school emphasizing MMA techniques - believing - that they too are about to learn things that are extremely applicable in the streets.

Traditional Martial Arts and Mixed Martial Arts, even put together, do not equate Reality-Based Self Defense. Sorry. I know this breaks the hearts of some of you, but it is a fact. The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable.

Some Reality-Based Fighting Principles CAN Find Their Way Into Traditional Martial Arts Systems

Let me say that some reality-based fighting principles can find their way into the curriculum of some traditional martial arts schools. For example, I have seen eye gouges demonstrated in some Kung Fu schools, and this is fine. But the problem is that over time, perfectly good, simple and easy-to-learn street fighting techniques like this one get lost in a plethora of countless other competing techniques taught, some effective, and some not so effective, that soon distract the student from knowing which one to choose and what really works best in most common situations.

Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) Does Not Emphasize "Street Smarts" - Because It Is A Sport!

I do not want to imply by any stretch of the imagination that a MMA guy is someone you should go around picking a fight with or that he is a pushover. This kind of thinking can get you a good "a...-whipping". But let's face it, a great deal of MMA guys are grapplers. What in the hell are you doing grappling on the ground in the streets! This is insane! The ground is NOT your friend!

On the ground, you lose peripheral vision, and you can't see if and when your opponent has buddies coming to the left or right of you ready to stomp your head into the ground - until you are dead. And falling onto the hard and unforgiving asphalt concrete with a 200 lb guy on top of you is not the same as falling on a soft padded mat with the watchful eye of the referee ready to let you "tap out" when things get too tough.

A "sports mindset" is not the best preparation for a life and death struggle for survival. Let MMA for the octagon, and just watch it on TV.

What Characterizes Reality-Based Self Defense

o It Doesn't Take A Long Time To Master - Where studying a martial art (as it should) may take you years and years to master and to a lesser degree so does sports and competitive fighting, Reality-Based Self Defense can take as little as 1 or 2 days of intensive scenario-based training where you are placed in simulated environments with your instructor. You would find yourself in a mock-alley ways, close-quarter rooms with plenty of furniture, or you may go outside to train on the streets - on the gravel, on leaves, on grass, on concrete or on snow.

o You Train For How And Where You Will Have To Fight - The idea is to go out of the usual temperature-controlled dojos and out into to realistic modern-day fighting environments. You train in your everyday clothes and in your shoes. You practice countering surprise attacks administered and directed by your instructor whose purpose is to induce within you the adrenaline rush that you will experience in a real street confrontation - and thus be comfortable with it.

One emotionally-charged weekend of good fight response experience with a good RBF instructor can change you so positively that your self-confidence and ability to respond will shoot through the roof, and this confidence will stay with you for the rest of your life.








And now I would like to invite you to get your Free Instant Access to two FREE Bonuses:

* a 12-minute TeleSeminar Audio on "How To Defeat A Mixed Martial Artist In A Real Street Fight"

* a FREE 52-Week eCourse on Secrets of Reality-Based Fighting (for a limited time only)

by simply visiting now:

http://www.CombatFightingSecrets.com/nofear.html

You will receive both FREE Bonuses right now and never again fear any man with guaranteed secrets of real self protection that you can apply immediately!

From Charles Prosper - The Street Fighting Sifu.


Top Secret: Self Defense eBook

Self Defense E-Book


Check it out!

Make Money Selling Your Art On EBay(R)!

Want to Sell Your Art Today? Ill Spill My Guts to You on How. Ive Done it Since 1999!


Check it out!

Become A Lethal Weapon In 2 Weeks!

Learn Unfair Self-defence-technique And Fighting Secrets Of The Most Dangerous And Most Respected Street Fighters In The World.


Check it out!

Street Fighter Moves - 3 Reasons Why Reality-Based Training is THE Antidote to the Fear of Fighting


About 3 months ago, I got an email in private from a martial artist who was studying Krav Maga.  He confided in me that though he trained with his Krav Maga techniques on a regular basis, something very strange and discouraging happened to him one night.  He was at a public place when an aggressor called him outside to fight.  And this is what he told me.  He froze like a dear caught in the headlights.  Nothing happened, but he walked away disheartened and confused and feeling like a "coward". 

I reassured him that his experience was more commonplace than he thought amongst those studying traditional martial arts.  I explained to him that he obviously was not experiencing reality-simulated fighting.  He was training in "fighting choreography" without the intense and unpredictable dynamic of a real street fight.  What he needed was reality-based training to prepare him for the real world.

3 Reasons Why Reality-Based Training Is The BEST Antidote To The Fear Of Fighting:

Reason #1 - Your Subconscious Mind "Knows" How The Fight Will End - Let us examine for a moment the dynamic of fear.  Fear is usually that of the unknown, that is, feeling that we will not be able to handle a situation.  This doubt causes a reflex action of visualizing ourselves failing and doing miserably.  Now once you train in reality-based scenarios, you "know" how each fight will end.  "You will win."  This is the belief that is engendered.  You see, believing  and "knowing"  are inseparable because knowing is just "believing" something with absolute certainty.

Reason #2 - You Get Used To The Adrenaline Rush - Whenever you sense or believe a real threat is impending, your body prepares you for danger with an adrenaline dump into your bloodstream to make you more efficient to handle the problem at hand.  The adrenaline rush cannot be avoided.  The problem is that the untrained person doesn't know what to do with it or how to handle it.  When the improperly trained person gets the adrenaline rush, he calls it "fear".  When the properly trained person gets this same adrenaline rush, he calls it "excitement" - same bodily experience only with a different label thus triggering a different psychological experience.

Reason #3 - You Usually Train With A "Non-Compliant" Partner - When you train in Traditional Martial Arts, you train with "Compliant" Partners.  What this means is that your training partner is cooperating with your technique.  He throws a punch and allows you to grab it in order to practice your counter move.  Real street aggressors are not cooperative with your techniques.  They are very, very non-compliant! 

A "Non-Compliant" training partner is instructed to attack you with surprise blows and moves, and he will resist as aggressively as possible to try his best to screw up the perfect execution of your technique.  This is what it is like in the real world, and if you can get used to training like this - you will become ready, and you will become fearless.








And now I would like to invite you to get your Free Instant Access to two FREE Bonuses:

* a 12-minute TeleSeminar Audio on "How To Defeat A Mixed Martial Artist In A Real Street Fight"

* a FREE 52-Week eCourse on Secrets of Reality-Based Fighting (for a limited time only)

by simply visiting now:

http://www.CombatFightingSecrets.com/nofear.html

You will receive both FREE Bonuses right now with guaranteed secrets of real self protection that you can apply immediately!

From Charles Prosper - The Street Fighting Sifu